People who choose not to work because God commanded it are morally right because they followed the command. By using this two ethic approaches the manager of BASF able to make decision , whether the factory will bring benefit to people around there or harm their future . Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. The second person realizes that they might die if they attempted to push someone out of the way, so they yell for the group to move. OɆË}u6|̲ÉOyUºú”{�_ß�Â0˜MÏ‚R}=M‹ƒéõAéİ¿p§. 1. People should act in such a way that their actions would become a universal law. His moral theory "is widely considered the most important and influential of all deontological theories" (Burnor and Raley). Immanuel Kant is a single of the greatest moral theorists of the eighteenth century. Even if you are being attacked by someone violently, you cannot respond in kind. This assignment covers the advantages and disadvantages of deontology and discourse ethics. His moral theory “is broadly deemed the most critical and influential of all deontological theories” (Burnor and Raley). 3. Deontology is an approach that focuses on the moral rightness or moral wrongness of a specific action. 3. Deontology also asks that people act as if they were responsible for creating laws and expectations within their society. He is the mastermind behind the moral theory, which is aptly named after him, Kantian Deontology. On an excessively windy day, two people look at a group of people who are about to be killed by a trailer. The act of killing someone purposely to save others is not allowed as “good,” but neither is allowing others to die if you can take action to prevent it. deontological duty is a per se violation of the moral law; consequences are only secondarily relevant. It could people at risk. Even lying to a murderer, he argued, to save someone from becoming a victim was morally wrong. It does not look at the consequences of such actions or the characteristics and habits of the actor involved. In deontology, there are times when the maximum welfare of society is forbidden. 4. {äÄG¯÷9 Let’s say that you’re a pacifist. - The first strength of Kantian deontology is that it rises above the most prominent flaw of relative theories; such as utilitarianism and situation ethics, it does not require a prediction of an actions consequence it determining its morality. That means situations are either good or bad based on the action that brought it about. In deontology, the person yelling is more in the right. It eliminates the idea of self-defense. endstream Kofi Annan: Importance of Youth Leadership, Youth Leadership in Community Development, Taking Youth Leadership to the Next Level, How We Are Helping Chinese Disabled Youth, Front Loading Washing Machines Pros and Cons List, Flat Organisational Structure Pros and Cons List, 22 Good Songs for 18th Birthday Slideshow, 23 Bible Verses About Death Of a Grandmother, 42 Good Songs for 70th Birthday Slideshow, 34 Good Songs for 40th Birthday Slideshow, 19 Primary Pros and Cons of Legalizing Weed, 32 Good Songs for Moms Birthday Slideshow. KANT’s (1724–1804) moral philosophy is a primary example of a deontological moral con- … It does has many attractive aspects, but it is not … However, of all of the core components in Kant's system - freedom constrained by obedience to universal moral law, the prioritization of duties over consequences, recognition of the danger of assuming certainty in the selection of optimal outcomes - the Categorical Imperative, which demands that we not only … The most distinctive feature of deontological moral conceptions is that they define fundamental principles of right and justice in terms other than taking the most effective means to promote maxi-mum good. endobj That means every perspective is individualized, but society will attempt to generalize. Say that God orders that all people not work on Sundays. xœå[ÛrG}×Wä¾A„h¦os‰} `�1^¯1 ]o„ñC©»f¦PMW««[£á3ĞÆ~ï�¬ª¹H0c°iÅŠ ú:yêäÉ“Ù­A”�ø¡% è{ü}K¿üŠJD÷ó‘¯�áˆÙÑ“zømLq²Ş~2¥§'Gƒı—¤ƒ'�ovnîˆ÷™w�†y”æY>Q±8zøï“Œ¾1G/ñçÀWûÔh?¿y§óCÇ43Â-q›f»m‰;òÖ,‰òx2ç4ÊÓh�óá�NJúåŞ›{í\RÑÙÖ,dóæ>M³ ŞvjÌYD?˜jFØÙ¬ÈÎMÓÓcMZIK­¡46¢×¢}g*Ùà$Ѻ3_ÿó_8X’²÷¥“ïù;¼ì+éøA+DŒàê®)æÂr¤*ºjUİšš One form of deontology involves divine commands. The advantages and disadvantages of both ethics going to make decided whether to build the German chemical firm or not. Here are some of the various pros and cons to deontological ethics that are worth considering. The first person makes an attempt to save their lives by pushing them out of the way. It is a process where all members of a society can aspire to be virtuous because they understand what is expected of them from an ethical standpoint. In deontology, right is always “right” and wrong is always “wrong.” There are no exceptions to this black-and-white concept, even if the situations rise to the extreme. It creates a level of personal responsibility. Creating disharmony would be considered ethically wrong, so it would be an action to be avoided. It creates a guideline to follow. Deontological theory is advantageous in that it is able to ground ethics upon law and duty. 13 0 obj It is a matter of subjective opinion. It offers a paradox. That means situations are either good or bad based on the action that brought it about. Main contents … endobj In deontology, that means one can never respond with violence, no matter what. You believe that all forms of violence are wrong. Your only available self-defense is to find a means of escape that does not involve harming yourself or someone else. Because there are no exceptions, it is difficult to always remain ethically “right” in deontology. Many religions even have this concept at the core of their “behavioral expectations” of faith. 2. 2. S•ªU¦ú½¹÷¤k*Ó�¨Jz%´\½¹ÌÇš¦dMU%´z',G�™òçşã’šä,iÄ+oN/”é¬^ ¡³Ê,µ,gë°h®. It does has a lot of desirable … There are times when the maximum welfare of a society is forbidden when following deontological ethics. In deontology, to be ethically right, people can only act in a way where humanity is treated as a means of an action and as an end. In this framework, we are always able to know exactly how we should act in a certain situation because we have either a theoretical foundation or a command upon which to base all of our decisions. Immanuel Kent introduced deontological ethics in the late 18th century. Deontological ethics create a paradox. His argument was that all ethics were absolute. It can be applied in non-realistic situations. << /Type /Page /Parent 1 0 R /LastModified (D:20201127231219+00'00') /Resources 2 0 R /MediaBox [0.000000 0.000000 595.276000 841.890000] /CropBox [0.000000 0.000000 595.276000 841.890000] /BleedBox [0.000000 0.000000 595.276000 841.890000] /TrimBox [0.000000 0.000000 595.276000 841.890000] /ArtBox [0.000000 0.000000 595.276000 841.890000] /Contents 14 0 R /Rotate 0 /Group << /Type /Group /S /Transparency /CS /DeviceRGB >> /Annots [ 7 0 R ] /PZ 1 >> He is the mastermind behind the moral theory, which is aptly named soon after him, Kantian Deontology. <> stream You are tasked with saving lives, but one cannot purposely sacrifice a life to save other lives. Because the action is the foundation of ethics, the pros and cons of deontological ethics do show us that society can benefit by having clear expectations for decisions. List of the Cons of Deontological Ethics 1. 14 0 obj The Pros and Cons of Kantian Deontology Moral Theory Immanuel Kant is one of the greatest moral theorists of the eighteenth century. As the theory is based upon the moral absolute of doing your duty it makes decision-making clearer and should lead everyone to the same conclusion without the … His argument is that because ethics are based on the action, a better choice would be to do nothing. The Pros and Cons of Kantian Deontology Moral Theory. “Deontology” is commonly used in moral philos-ophy to refer to nonconsequentialist moral concep-tions. It does not look at the consequences of such actions or the characteristics and habits of the actor involved. It is a practical application of the “Golden Rule.” The Golden Rule is a long-time standard for human conduct. The downfall of this ethical theory is that certain standards will always be subjective, especially when divine commands are included. Ù¬×GØÿøá?�\´—GıP†\ı�Ä Rñj’¼ø|ÅĞnøW$ŸFt/XÉÿt�…2 Pros and Cons Deontology is an approach that focuses on the moral rightness or moral wrongness of a specific action. The end result is that some people will always see an action as “right” and others will see it as “wrong,” no matter what. 5. Actions should only be taken in a way that would harmonize society if all the laws and procedures enacted were to harmonize. øÙîYüË/®Ì³iõOÆà 1. People who choose not to work because they would rather play video games on Sunday are morally wrong, not because of what they are doing, but because their purpose was to avoid following God’s commands.